Writing border paper
Essay Samples For Teachers
Wednesday, August 26, 2020
Consumer Behaviour Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 words - 2
Shopper Behavior - Essay Example Microsoftââ¬â¢s Xbox, Sonyââ¬â¢s PlayStation Series and Nintendoââ¬â¢s GameCube games all have been around for various years however still these huge market players have neglected to distinguish sizeable specialty showcase sections game consoles that exist to date in the business. Nokia has both the asset capacity and innovation to enter this market section easily in structure and arranging (Gale Reference Team, 2008). For example each of the three game comfort producers referenced above alongside a various of other little and medium organizations have had the option to expand their pieces of the overall industry in spite of a continuous worldwide monetary downturn. Nokiaââ¬â¢s existing asset and innovation capacities would require appropriate directional direction from prepared hands, particularly the specialized and administrative staff. As of now the over three market leadersââ¬â¢ status has been tested by numerous little and medium scale makers whose capacity to distinguish specialty showcase portions with regards to shopper socioeconomics is supposed to be one reason for their prosperity (Development and Learning in Organizations, diary, 2003). For example Nokiaââ¬â¢s achievement in cell phone gadget assembling can be used to create a game support that effectively fuses a portion of its previously attempted and relinquished versatile game highlights (Gale Reference Team, 2007). So far game consoles havenââ¬â¢t been incorporated with versatile communication innovation aside from at irregular considerations did by Sony in its PlayStation Series. A large portion of the current writing and talk on game consoles are portrayed by four fundamental classes of issues â⬠mechanical issues, valuing issues, quality issues and security issues. Itââ¬â¢s along these lines an industry that is ever progressively being set apart by rivalry and reorientation. Against this scenery of stiffer rivalry itââ¬â¢s fundamental to distinguish the different issue related results in the business along these lines concentrating consideration on the deliberately
Saturday, August 22, 2020
The Republic by Plato Essay Example for Free
The Republic by Plato Essay In the book The Republic, Plato investigates the secret contained in carrying on with a decent life where he takes a gander at carrying on with a fair life and what it involves. He additionally takes a gander at life when there are logician lords administering. The principle character in the book is Socrates who is occupied with a conversation by certain companions he meets when originating from the Piraeus to offer his petitions. He is strolling with Glaucon on his way to the city when Polemarchus gets a quick look at him and welcomes him to stroll with him alongside Adeimantus who is the sibling to Glaucon and they wind up heading off to his home. When they get to the home of Polemarchus, there they discover Cephalus his dad, his siblings Lysias and Euthademus and furthermore Thrasymachus, Cleitophon and Charmantides. Cephalus rebukes Socrates for not visiting him frequently yet he is an elderly person who can't have the option to go as he would wish. He anyway acknowledges mature age since it has given him harmony that he was unable to have gotten when he was more youthful. He admonishes the integrity of mature age as opposed to grumbling as his companions did about the ills of mature age. Socrates becomes captivated and asks him whether his position is influenced by the way that he is rich and there begins the conversation of what makes one substance with his life. Cephalus is persuaded that ones demeanor decides how satisfied or unhappy one is with his life. As indicated by him wealth whether gained or acquired doesn't have an influence in ones bliss rather how you have chosen to carry on with your life is the thing that issues (Jowett B. pg 11). He is of the possibility that a decent man whether poor or rich is a glad man while an awful man whether rich or poor is a miserable man. He characterized a decent man as he who is simply to other people. Socrates needs to realize what equity is and along these lines the start of the conversation about equity. Since they characterized equity as talking reality and taking care of obligations, Socrates needs to know whether there are any exemptions to these principles. He additionally needs to know whether one turns out to be less just on the off chance that he concludes that it is for the best not to do precisely as required by the standard of equity in the event that it makes more damage than anything else comply with the standard. Socrates is of the supposition that equity must have an a lot more extensive definition than the one as of now being used. Now Cephalus exits and leave his child to assume control over the discussion for his sake. Polemarchus is of a similar supposition as Socrates yet cites a regarded man and an artist (Simonides) as having said diversely yet pardons him by expecting that he had not considered all the situations that are conceivable. à Polemarchus is anyway of the supposition that this standard just applies to those individuals who are viewed as ones companions. To the individuals who are adversaries, the standard of returning what is owed applies carefully regardless of whether by doing so one reason mischief to the one getting what is owed. He deciphers what Simonides implied when he expounded on equity and accept it to imply that one should provide for every what they merit implying that to a companion one ought to do what is acceptable and to an adversary one should give abhorrent. On the off chance that by reimbursing an obligation one is doing malice to a companion, at that point one ought not reimburse it however on the off chance that it is to a foe one should have the option to do so happily. In their conversation, it develops that there are times that foul play is wanted to equity and that much of the time it is viewed as futile when different things are helpful and the other way around (Jowett B. pg 17). After much conversation they appear to concur that a simply man can't make hurt others whether they are adversaries or companions. This at that point leaves them with no meaning of what equity is yet they require realizing what it is. Now, Thrasymachus enters the discussion however for him to offer his input of what he thinks equity is, he requests that he be paid some cash. He acquaints with the peruser the third meaning of equity which he professes to be the enthusiasm of the more grounded (Jowett B. pg21). This is on the grounds that the laws administering peopleââ¬â¢s deeds are detailed by the administration which thusly is comprised of the tough individuals paying little heed to what kind of government it is. Socrates addresses this definition since the rulers might not be right in figuring the laws and make some which may make injury them. In the event that the subjects in being simply should comply with the law, the inquiry at that point becomes whether by making injury the ruler they are as yet expected to be simply. Now, Cleitophon contributes by saying that as long as the more grounded believed that whatever was being done was to his advantage, at that point it was equity to feel free to do it regardless of its expected damage to him. Thrasymachus characterizes the ruler or the more grounded man as he who can't commit an error and on the off chance that one makes a slip-up, he stops to be a ruler. Socrates solicits him who is the ace from a workmanship and after it is built up that the person who accomplishes something best is the ace of the exchange. In consenting to this, Thrasmychus ends up cornered by Socrates since then it implies that the ruler characterizes equity as that which serves the enthusiasm of his subjects and not his own advantages. This is on the grounds that an ace of a workmanship does everything he can to help those under him and one of the models given is that of a doctor who does everything he can to serve the patient yet he is the ace of the craftsmanship. It appears for this situation that the ruler has made a law that influences him contrarily in light of the fact that it has decreased his social standing. Along these lines at that point, the ruler has committed an error and subsequently quits turning into a ruler since he has not placed his inclinations first in making the law. Thrasymachus is of the assessment that the low man benefits more than the only one does and he characterizes equity as ââ¬Å" the enthusiasm of the more grounded though foul play is a manââ¬â¢s own benefit an interestâ⬠(Jowett B. pg 27). He appears not be reliable in his view since he ascribes various characteristics to various callings as the meaning of equity. The conversation takes a turn at towards impeccable social orders where the consummately vile society is viewed as being more gainful than the superbly just society. Thrasymachus is of the supposition that simply individuals need correspondence with the equitable yet need to have more than the crooked while the low needs more than everybody (Jowett B. pg 32). Socrates inquires as to whether an uncalled for society can have the option to lead without practicing any type of equity. He anyway doesn't get an exact answer. The primary book closes with the inquiry whether equity is acceptable or abhorrent. Thrasymachus stays quiet from this second on. Glaucon enters the scene with examining Socrates concerning the kinds of products there are and how they can be ordered. They think of three sorts of products an equity is put at the degree of merchandise which are acknowledged on the grounds that by rehearsing them one gains however on the off chance that they had another decision would prefer not take part in them along these lines favoring foul play to it (Jowett B. pg 38). In doing this he is by all accounts supporting the situation of Thrasmychus yet at the same time needs to get the point of view of Socrates on the genuine idea of equity. He accepts that individuals do what is acceptable in light of the fact that they fear the repercussions of doing insidious and on the off chance that they had a decision they would settle on fiendish other than great. To help his position, he recounts to the account of Gyges, a shepherd, who got a ring from a dead keeps an eye on body that had the ability to make one undetectable. The ring permitted him to do things that he would somehow not do with individuals seeing him. Individuals comply with the standards of equity since others can see them yet on the off chance that quite possibly they won't be seen, at that point their actual sentiments rise and regularly than not they (the emotions) will be slanted towards shamefulness and malice. As the story is told, Gyges utilizes the ring to get undetectable and lure the sovereign who helped him wipe out the lord and he turned into the ruler. Clearly before his having the ring, he was unable to have done so yet under the appearance of imperceptibility he had the option to do a lot of fiendishness (Jowett B. pg 39). Glaucon needs the treacherous man to be absolutely unreasonable and the simply man to be absolutely on the grounds that all out unfairness can be confounded to mean equity. Adeimantus his sibling underpins him by including that guardians encourage their kids to be simply so that in future they might have the option to land great positions and relationships and not really to make them great. Anyway Socrates is persuaded that they are contending for shamefulness yet they don't put stock in being out of line (Jowett B. pg 45). As indicated by Socrates, a state emerges because of the necessities that individuals have and it must be involved various classifications of individuals who all work together to guarantee the decency of all. Equity should have prompted the presence of three classes of individuals to be specific: the rulers, the makers and the troopers. They all have indicated obligations and none should attempt to do anotherââ¬â¢s in light of the fact that that would be regarded as being treacherous. They all have their jobs and to expect anotherââ¬â¢s job is to ransack the person of his method of procuring a living thus getting accidentally unjustifiable. Likewise in attempting to include another personââ¬â¢s load onto your own, it would prompt making a terrible showing henceforth getting unjustifiable to the individuals who confided in you to carry out the responsibility for them (Jowett B. pg 47). Socrates takes both Glaucon and Adeimantus through the development of a state where the three classifications of individuals exist with equity being characterized as disapproving of ones business and letting others do likewise up to where out of expanded needs, the jobs begin to intermix prompting a breakdown of equity. Individuals in the state necessitate what doesn't have a place with them to make their lives agreeable and in this manner become shameful. He at that point chooses to make a perfect city where there is no private property or even spouses and kids. This is accomplished for the benefit of everyone and in such a city equity isn't required. The conversation changes from whether a city is simply to the topic of whether there is any chance of s
Monday, August 17, 2020
Interview Lessons from an IKEA Cartoon
Interview Lessons from an IKEA Cartoon A cartoon image that had me laughing out loud was an âIKEA Job Interview.â The interviewer sits behind a desk in a sparsely furnished room and points to a bunch of pieces of a disassembled chair, which lie neatly on the floor. âPlease have a seat,â says the interviewer. While this image is hilarious, if the job interview were for a mechanic or an assembler of chairs at IKEA, the scene would not be so farfetched. And in fact, it is not unusual for an interviewer to test an interviewee with a task to perform on the spot. A good interviewer might test your practical skills in an interview, or your ability to respond to criticism, by asking you to perform a task or adjust your demeanor mid-interview. I once interviewed a young man for a social worker position at the non-profit where I worked in Brooklyn, NY. There were two of us interviewing him, and I really liked him. He answered questions well and I was considering hiring him. My frustration was that he never made eye contact with me. It seemed as if he were gazing off into space and not fully connecting with me. And I knew there was no way I would actually hire him if he couldnât make eye contact. I did something perhaps unconventional. I stopped the interview, told him what I was experiencing, and asked him why he wasnât making eye contact. He gave a reasonable response that he was struggling with having two interviewers and didnât want either of us to get all his focus. From that moment in the interview, he made full eye contact with either me or my associate. I hired him. Why? Because I knew beyond doubt from that interview that this man took criticism and coaching well, and could implement a suggestion quickly and effectively. He also had all the other qualifications we were looking for. He is still working at the organization today, and is appreciated for his work ethic and great attitude, as well as for the results he produces. So this IKEA cartoon, while humorous, might not be that far off the mark for something you might be called upon to perform on the spot in a job interview. Luckily, all the tools you need are already in your possession. You just need to be good at following directions.
Sunday, May 24, 2020
Powered by Publics LSU Part of National Effort to Increase College Access and Completion - Free Essay Example
Sample details Pages: 4 Words: 1104 Downloads: 8 Date added: 2019/08/08 Category Music Essay Level High school Tags: Hip Hop Essay Did you like this example? During the Fall of 2018, the Association of Public Land-Grant Universities (APLU) announced its Powered by Publics initiative, the largest concerted effort to increase college access in history. The initiative has three goals: (1) award hundreds of thousands more degrees by 2025; (2) eliminate the achievement gap for low-income, minority, and first-generation students, while maintaining or expanding access to higher education for these students; (3) share key data within the clusters and promulgate proven practices across the entire public higher education sector. As of December 2018, 130 institutions have joined the initiative. Donââ¬â¢t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Powered by Publics: LSU Part of National Effort to Increase College Access and Completion" essay for you Create order The coalition of intuitions plans to find evidence-based strategies and new solutions to achieve equity in college access. Powered by Publics is an institutional response to the 21st century college access movement, which traces its roots to the student organizing of the 60s and 70s. Months before the APLUs announcement, the National Association for College Admission Counseling released a study on Test-Optional Policies (TOPs), admissions policies that dont require standardized tests (SAT or ACT). They found that TOPs increased enrollment of students of color and students from low-socioeconomic backgrounds. Their findings are not surprising, studies have shown that the SAT and ACT have large, racial performance gaps (Freedle, 2003) (Santelices Wilson, 2010) (Rattani, 2016) (Johnson, 2003), positioning them as barriers to college for Black and Latino students. Since 2004, over 1,000 accredited colleges and universities across the country have adopted TOPs, a trend that more will follow. With the movement toward college access, the enrollment of Black college students from low-socioeconomic backgrounds is expected to increase in the next 10 years. While administrations pursue new ways to prioritize diversity and accessibility, so must academic departments and programs. English composition, a course required for all students despite their program of study, is arguably the most important and most in need of change. Lynn Bloom has argued that composition is not only about English instruction, it is about initiating students into proper citizenship. It serves as students first introduction to academic discourse and has the potential to shape their relationship with it moving forward. Composition is a gatekeeper to college access in this way and needs to change with the changing student body. There is no shortage of literature about diversifying college composition, however, composition courses continue to be taught in ways that are hostile to the success of Black students. There are two ways that college composition negatively impacts Black students: the normalizing of white, middle class values and the denial of Black Vernacular English (BVE) in the classroom. To address these issues, I propose that English departments incorporate Hip Hop educational research into their curriculum. Hip Hop pedagogies provide the perfect nexus of culturally relevant linguistic and rhetorical study. According to Emery Petchauer, there are three kinds of Hip Hop educational research: (a) hip-hop-based educationâ⬠¢studies that use hip-hop, especially rap songs and lyrics, as curricular and pedagogical resources; (b) hip-hop, meaning(s), and identitiesâ⬠¢studies that focus on how students mobilize these texts and how they intersect with identities; and (c) hip-hop aesthetic formsâ⬠¢studies that conceptualize the ways of doing or habits of mind produced by hip-hop practices. Applied to practice, these Hip Hop pedagogies will scaffold analytical skills, affirm th e academic validity of BVE, and sharpen critical literacies through comparative cultural study. The Composition Classroom as a Site for Assimilation Cultural assimilation is the process that minority students undergo as they adapt the culture, language, and norms of higher education, a culture that is exclusively middle-class and white. The process is not linear, nor is it absolute, but it is required in some aspect for success within the university structure. Non-white and/or lower-class students must learn to speak and write in Sanctioned American English (SAE) (Elbow, 2010) and conduct themselves according to middle-class propriety. Students who do not conform have difficulty navigating the academy, receive poor grades, or in the worst cases, drop-out. Black undergraduates, who have the lowest retention and graduation rate with the highest drop-out rate, face significant damage to their mental health due to the pressures of assimilation (McGee Stovall, 2015). The primary site for assimilation in the college and university structure is the English composition classroom, where students are first taught to divorce their academic identities from their native culture. According to Lynn Bloom, freshman composition is a middle-class enterprise where students are initiated as good citizens of the university, and essentially, the middle-class. After completing the course, students are expected to effectively participate in the dominant discourse of the middle-class. This expectation is shaped by higher educations promise of class mobility and is the unspoken reason the course is required as an entry-point. Students are indoctrinated and disinfected by the value systems upheld by middle-class teachers in middle-class institutions. Values like respectability, propriety, order, and self-reliance pervade the classroom and hurt lower-class students who have different value systems. Adding a critical race lens to Blooms class lens positions Black students as experiencing a compounded clash of value systems in the composition classroom. Due to the history of slavery and racist social policies in the U.S., race is strongly correlated with class status. The mi ddle-class is historically and majority white and the lower-class is Black and Latinx (Gans, 2005). Therefore, freshman composition is not only a middle-class enterprise, but a white enterprise. The dominant narrative is that all students, regardless of race, enter higher education with the goal of upward mobility. If this is true, why would upholding middle-class, white values of communication and expecting students to assimilate be problematic if it allows them the mobility that they seek? It is problematic because the dominant narrative of class mobility is not the only narrative, nor does it account for the complexity of the race-class matrix. Not all students of color enter higher education with the goal of a middle-class life, a point that Carmen Kynard illustrates in her book Vernacular Insurrections. Her composition colleagues belief that Black students wanted the same liberal arts education as everyone else (2) was vastly different than what her inner-city, high school students expected from college. They imagined college as a liberatory tool that could provide them with the knowledge they needed to better their communities and increase access to higher education fo r students like themselves, a sentiment I heard echoed by many Black students when I was an undergraduate. I found that even students outside of the social sciences and humanities, students who were pursuing paths in engineering, computer science, or health wanted to connect their work to the communities they came from by reducing racial disparities. Goals like these require fluid communication skills, not the strict adherence to white, middle-classed language taught in college composition, language inaccessible to the people they want to help.
Wednesday, May 13, 2020
The Ultimately Successful The Houthi Movement - 1496 Words
Ultimately successful the Houthi movement was able to get a greater role in the Yemeni government, and even more local autonomy. This agreement helped stave of a full-fledged civil war, but at the same time it reduced the governments ability to conduct any real political or economic reforms. Despite this new agreement President Hadi was ever more determined to ensure no one faction gained too much power within the new federal system. Thus he put forth his chief of staff, Ahmad Awad bin Mubarak, as candidate for Prime Minister in an attempt to help establish his system. The Houthi leadership ultimately did not approve of the appointment, due to Mubarakââ¬â¢s close relationships with President Hadi, so in January of this year Mubarak was abducted at gunpoint. With President Hadi choice no longer an option, the Houthi Leadership wanted one of there own to be come the Prime Minister. Later that month, after the Houthis rejected a power sharing deal a few months prior, and many events causing undue pressure on President Hadi and his cabinet, decided to resign their offices. In a manor of day the Houthi rebels stormed and took over the presidential palace and forced Hadi and his Prime Minister, Khaled Bahah, to officially send resignation letter to the parliament, which promptly declined their resignations; but nonetheless the Houthi rebels forced them out of office and dissolved the cabinet. The Houthi rebels put both Hadi and Bahah under strict house arrest. Hadi later escaped to
Wednesday, May 6, 2020
The Pursuit of Self-Identification Free Essays
In the novel The Jade Peony, author, Wayson Choy, intelligently writes about two siblings who struggle in the pursuit of self-identification. Their struggles vary as they do not share the same problems during this tough period of their lives. This leads to the debate, whose childhood experiences will affect them more as an adult? Although Jook-Liang had to go through the tough situation of always being under prioritized and always being undermined, her childhood troubles and experiences could never truly be compared with the experiences of Jung Sum. We will write a custom essay sample on The Pursuit of Self-Identification or any similar topic only for you Order Now To put it bluntly, Jung Sumââ¬â¢s childhood experiences will affect him more as an adult than Jook-Liangââ¬â¢s experiences would. The reason for this is because, firstly, Jung Sum, as a child, was never truly showered with love, neither was Jook-Liang, but she did not have to suffer the pain of losing her birth parents as Jung Sum did. Also, Jung Sum had to experience the pain of losing a treasured person or pet multiple times, and while Jook-Liang did lose a person close to her heart, she only experienced it once. Finally, as both Jook-Liang and Jung Sum struggled with identification, Jung Sum was met with problems while identifying his sexual identity, which was not accepted by any society at that period of time. On the other hand Jook-Liang was only required to identify culturally which would cause problems but eventually allow gain acceptance into at least one society. To start with, Jung Sum never had the privilege of being showered with love during his childhood and even though Jook-Liang was greatly oppressed and unfairly treated by people around her, such as Poh-Poh, she would still ocassionally be loved by those surrounding people. This is evident when Poh-Poh helped Jook-Liang to tie her shoelaces while she was getting ready to dance for Wong Suk (Choy 30). As for Jung Sum, although he was only a child, his birth father would violently abuse him and his mother when he was drunk. The quote ââ¬Å"I waited for Daddy to get up from the kitchen floor, half-drunk, waited for him to beat me with his belt. â⬠(Choy 96) clearly shows that Jung Sum had to face the unlucky circumstances of child abuse, something Jook-Liang had the privilege of avoiding as her family never resorted to physical abuse. It would be a scarring memory to be violently abused by onesââ¬â¢ own father as a child, a memory that could be carried for a lifetime. This may affect Jung Sum in his latter years as he may recall the abuse of his father and feel dysfunctional. These unresolved issues could cause a severe case of depression in his life. Furthermore, as Jung Sum was adopted into a new family, he immediately felt like an outsider. ââ¬Å"He thought I was too weak to be his brother, a real brother,â⬠(Choy 93) shows that Jung Sum clearly felt marginalized by his new older brother, Kiam. To be adopted into a family full of new and unfamiliar faces and be rebuked immediately by his own ââ¬Å"brotherâ⬠was a tough situation to be in, especially after losing both his parents. Jook-Liang did not have to go through the process of being adopted into a new family or having to lose her family members prematurely while Jung Sum did. This could possibly go on to affect Jung Sum and make him feel as though he had no one to rely on but himself, possibly causing him to have a lack of trust for other people in the future. Additionally, his childhood experiences may lead him to develop into an adult influenced by those experiences. These unresolved child issues could dwell within him and could cause him to either be more aggressive or more reserved as an adult. He may recall those experiences when dealing with his own children in the future and could possibly treat them the same way his own father treated him or otherwise, might not even attempt to have a close relationship with them. As Jook-Liang did not undergo any extreme circumstances of child abuse, she would probably be less affected as an adult when compared to Jung Sum. Therefore, Jung Sum has a relatively greater impact on his future life from his adolescent experiences as his experiences produces permanent scars where the problem was not greatly alleviated afterwards. Another problem faced by both of the siblings was with different aspects of identification. Jook-Liang had to struggle with cultural identification while Jung Sum faced problems with sexual identification. Homosexuality is an unaccepted identification which will not be tolerated by any society back in the 1930s, while switching cultural identities will still allow the person to gain acceptance in at least one society. His sexual identity was first suggested in the novel by Poh-Poh as he says that ââ¬Å"Jung Sum is the moonâ⬠(Choy 88). Jung Sum then figures out his own sexual identity as it was Frank Yuen that he desired most at that moment during Frank Yuenââ¬â¢s farewell instead of courage (Choy 138) and that ââ¬Å"Frank Yuen is the Sunâ⬠(Choy 132) while he is the moon. Having to figure out his own sexual identity at such a young age without any guidance was a hard chore as back then love relationships were known to be present only between females and males. In addition, love between the same gender was not only unaccepted in the society, it was greatly rejected. As a result, Jung Sum had to keep his love for the same gender a secret. The inability to reveal his sexual identification would cause him to have the lack of freedom in the pursuit of a preferred life partner. This could affect his happiness as a whole as he is unable to share life experiences in the love aspect of his life as others normally do because of the inability to express his love for his preferred partner. On the other hand, even though Jook-Liang struggled with her cultural identity, no matter which culture she decides to identify with, she would be still accepted, eventually. Jook-Liangââ¬â¢s desire to assimilate into another culture is evidently shown as she looks up to Shirley Temple, an American dancer and actress. Wanting to assimilate into the western culture, she even hoped to see her own reflection in the mirror possessing a westernerââ¬â¢s features, specifically, Shirley Templeââ¬â¢s features (Choy 41). Her struggle comes in as Poh-Poh constantly reminds her of her cultural roots and where she belongs. In the novel, Poh-poh repeatedly tells Jook-Liang that she is not from Canadaâ⬠¦ and that she is from China (Choy 34). In comparison of their situation as they struggle to identify themselves in the different aspect, Jung Sum is clearly portrayed to have a harder time even in the future. Not being able to be what he really is, his future would be oppressed as he suppresses himself, such that his secret would not be revealed. To put on a mask his entire life and never reveal his sexuality will take a toll on his adult life and he could never truly bring himself to enjoy his life as a whole. Jook-Liangââ¬â¢s preference of either culture will still allow her to be accepted and although she may not gain the acceptance of one society, she will still gain the acceptance of another, allowing her to lead a normal life. Thirdly, both parties went through the turmoil of losing their loved ones, but Jung Sum had to experience losing many loved ones, losing his mother to violence Frank Yuen to the marines and even his pet turtle, Lao Kwei, to Dai Kew. On the other hand, Jook-Liang only had to experience losing her loved one, Wong Suk, as she never saw him again after he left to go back to China (Choy 71). From when Jung Sum was just a kid, life was tough for him as his father would often abuse him and his mother when he was drunk. His mother was the only one who would protect him from harm from his drunk father as Jung Sum would always be waiting for her to ââ¬Å"tell him to stopâ⬠¦[and] twist against the falling belt and take the blowsâ⬠(Choy 96). Having such a rough childhood is scarring enough for Jung Sum and yet, he lost his mother at that young age. He went through various foster homes and eventually ended up with the Chen family where he finally found a place called home. In the Chen family, the life for him from the beginning was not exactly hard, as Father and stepmother treated him relatively well. However, he still took time to adapt and at his time with the Chen family, he discovered Lao Kwei and was ecstatic that he could finally own something, having something that he felt that truly belonged to him. Not long after, he lost his beloved turtle as his family decided that it would be okay for Dai Kew to claim back his turtle as he required it for his own personal purposes (Choy 85). Next, when he came to realize that he had a strong attraction to Frank Yuen, it was not long after that he Frank Yuen left him too. As Frank Yuen left to Seattle to join the marines, he left Vancouver and was not expected to return for the next few years (Choy 134). It is evident that Jung Sum had to experience more pain and suffering than Jook-Liang as he had to repeatedly lose loved ones to different circumstances while Jook-Liang only had to go through that process once. This could cause Jung Sum to gain an insecure mentality that will cause him to always expect the least out of something, possibly causing him to lose hope in many things in the future. Although Jook-Liang may feel sad and depressed about the departure of Wong Suk, she would not have to endure the pain of losing another loved one anytime soon. Coming to a conclusion, both Jook-Liang and Jung Sum had to undergo many challenges and experiences as a child which could affect them as adults. Although Jook-Liang did experience tough trials during her childhood, Jung Sum was a victim of severe turmoil as a child and therefore, his experiences will affect him more as an adult. As a child, Jung Sum never had the opportunity of being showered with love by his own family as Jook-Liang did. Other than that, he also had to experience the pain of losing a loved one or a treasured pet a few times while Jook-Liang only experienced it once. Lastly, his homosexuality was adamantly not accepted by any society in the world at that moment in time while Jook-Liang had to only face the troubles of cultural identification, which still allowed her to be accepted by at least one type of society. All in all, Jung Sum had a tougher childhood experience than Jook-Liang and that would affect his adult life greatly in the future. How to cite The Pursuit of Self-Identification, Papers
Monday, May 4, 2020
Great Expectations Vs. Oliver Twist Essay Example For Students
Great Expectations Vs. Oliver Twist Essay During his lifetime, Charles Dickens is known to have written severalbooks. Although each book is different, they also share many similarities. Two of his books, Great Expectations and Oliver Twist, are representativesof the many kinds of differences and similarities found within his work. Perhaps the reason why these two novels share some of the samequalities is because they both reflect painful experiences which occurredin Dickens past. During his childhood, Charles Dickens suffered much abusefrom his parents.1 This abuse is often expressed in his novels. Pip, inGreat Expectations, talked often about the abuse he received at the handsof his sister, Mrs. Joe Gargery. On one occasion he remarked, I soon foundmyself getting heavily bumped from behind in the nape of the neck and thesmall of the back, and having my face ignominously shoved against the wall,because I did not answer those questions at sufficient length.2While at the orphanage, Oliver from Oliver Twist also experienced agreat amount of abuse. For example, while suffering from starvation andmalnutrition for a long period of time, Oliver was chosen by the other boysat the orphanage to request more gruel at dinner one night. After makingthis simple request, the master (at the orphanage) aimed a blow atOlivers h ead with the ladle; pinioned him in his arms; and shrieked aloudfor the beadle.3The whole beginning of Oliver Twists story was created from memorieswhich related to Charles Dickens childhood in a blacking factory ( whichwas overshadowed by the Marshalsea Prison ).4 While working in the blackingfactory, Dickens suffered tremendous humiliation. This humiliation isgreatly expressed through Olivers adventures at the orphanage before he issent away. Throughout his lifetime, Dickens appeared to have acquired a fondnessfor the bleak, the sordid, and the austere.5 Most of Oliver Twist, forexample, takes place in Londons lowest slums.6 The city is described as amaze which involves a mystery of darkness, anonymity, and peril.7 Many ofthe settings, such as the pickpockets hideout, the surrounding streets,and the bars, are also described as dark, gloomy, and bland.8 Meanwhile, inGreat Expectations, Miss Havishams house is often made to sounddepressing, old, and lonely. Many of the objects within the house had notbeen touched or moved in many years. Cobwebs were clearly visible as wellas an abundance of dust, and even the wedding dress which Miss Havishamconstantly wore had turned yellow with age.9However, similarities are not just found in the settings. The novelstwo main characters, Pip and Oliver, are also similar in many ways. Bothyoung boys were orphaned practically from birth; but where Pip is sent tolive with and be abused by his sister, Oliver is sent to live in anorphanage. Pip is a very curious young boy. He is a child of intense andyearning fancy.10 Yet, Oliver is well spoken. Even while his life was indanger while in the hands of Fagin and Bill Sikes, two connivingpickpockets, he refused to participate in the stealing which he so greatlyopposed. All Oliver really longed for was to escape from harsh livingconditions and evil surroundings which he had grown up in.11 However, nomatter how tempting the evil may have been, Oliver stood by his beliefs. Therefore, he can be referred to as ideal and incorruptible innocence.12It is Olivers self-generated and self-sustained love, conferred it wouldseem from Heaven alone, that preserves him from disaster and death.13Unfortunately, many critics have found it hard to believe that a boysuch as Oliver Twist could remain so innocent, pure, and well spoken giventhe long period of time in which he was surrounded by evil andinjustices.14Pip, on the other hand, is a dreamer. His imagination is alwayshelping him to create situations to cover up for his hard times. Forexample, when questioned about his first visit to Miss Havishams house, hemade up along elaborate story to make up for the terrible time he had inreality. Instead of telling how he played cards all day while beingridiculed and criticized by Estella and Miss Havisham, he claimed that theyplayed with flags and swords all day after having wine and cake on goldplates.15 However, one special quality possessed by Pip that is rarely seenin a novels hero is that he wrongs others instead of being hurt himselfall of the time.16Another similarity between Oliver and Pip is that they both have hadinteractions with convicts. Fagin the head of a group of young thieves,spends most of his time trying to demoralize and corrupt Oliver andprevent him from ever coming into his inheritance.17 To Oliver, he is seenas an escape from all previous misery. He also helps Oliver to ease anyfears about starvation and loneliness.18Just as Fagin is Olivers means of escape, Magwitch, an escapedconvict, is Pips. However, as Fagin provides Oliver with an escape frommisery, Magwitch tries to provide Pip with an escape from poverty bybecoming his anonymous benefactor. Creative Writing: The Person Behind The Mask EssayBIBLIOGRAPHYCarey, John. Here Comes Dickens The Imagination of aNovelist. New York: Schocken Books, 1974. Dickens, Charles. Great Expectations. New York: TheHeritage Club, 1939. Dickens, Charles. Oliver Twist. New York: Dodd, Mead, andCompany, 1949. Johnson, Edgar. Charles Dickens His Tragedy and Triumph. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1952. Kincaid, James R. Dickens and the Rhetoric of Laughter. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1971. Marcus, Steven. Dickens: From Pickwick to Dombey. GreatBritain: Basic Books, 1965. Slater, Michael, ed. Dickens 1970. New York: Stein and DayPublishers, 1970. Slater, Michael. Dickens and Women. California: StanfordUniversity Press, 1983. Stewart, Garrett. Dickens and the Trials of Imagination. Massachusettes: Harvard University Press, 1974. Welsh, Alexander. The City of Dickens. Oxford: ClaredonPress, 1971. Wilkie, Katherine E. Charles Dickens, The Inimitable Boz. New York: Abelard Schuman, 1970. FOOTNOTES1 Steven Marcus, Dickens: From Pickwick to Dombey (GreatBritain: Basic Books, 1965) 82. 2 Charles Dickens, Great Expectations (New York: The HeritageClub, 1939) 69. 3 Charles Dickens, Oliver Twist (New York: Dodd, Mead, andCompany, 1949) 16-17. 4 Katharine E. Wilkie, Charles Dickens, The Inimitable Boz(New York: Abelard Schuman, 1970) 77-78. 5 Marcus 71. 6 Wilkie 77. 7 Marcus 256. 8 Edgar Johnson, Charles Dickens His Tragedy and Triumph(New York: Simon and Schuster, 1952) 273. 9 Dickens, Expectations 62. 10 Garrett Stewart, Dickens and the Trials of Imagination(Massachusettes: Harvard University Press, 1974) 187. 11 Marcus 74. 12 Marcus 80. 13 Marcus 83. 14 John Carey, Here Comes Dickens The Imagination of aNovelist (New York: Schocken Books, 1974) 149. 15 Dickens, Expectations 71-72. 16 Alexander Welsh, The City of Dickens (Oxford: ClaredonPress, 1971) 107-108. 17 Marcus 75. 18 James R. Kincaid, Dickens and the Rhetoric of Laughter(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1971) 72. 19 Kincaid 51. 20 Kincaid 51. 21 Kincaid 53. 22 Kincaid 72. 23 Wilkie 78. 24 Welsh 82. 25 Marcus 55.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)